Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/December 2024
Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2024 at 04:28:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info Emmeline Pankhurst, oil on canvas by Georgina Agnes Brackenbury. Created by National Portrait Gallery - uploaded by Madame Tatillonne - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Bottom, left and top of the painting missing. High ISO, low quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin Thank you for noticing! // Zquid (talk) 22:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome! -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 13:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC).
File:Wooden hut fence mountains and blue sky in the green rice fields of Vang Vieng in Laos.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 07:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Thank you very much, Tomer T, for the nomination. Tiny isolated hut in a green environment -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support This one is wonderful Cmao20 (talk) 01:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Red Salvia and Celosia in the flower garden of the Tumuli Park at sunset in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 22:10:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Unusual and sensitive composition. Great work. Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Per Cmao20.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 01:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
Info Nice landscape with cool wispy clouds from an underrepresented part of the world at FPC. created by Assylkhan.abdrakhmanov - uploaded by Assylkhan.abdrakhmanov - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- I love these landscapes.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice contrast between the greenery and the snow. --Yann (talk) 07:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Splendid landscape. – Aristeas (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support as per Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support splendid landscape; K is so beautiful! --SHB2000 (talk) 06:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 13:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support – Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 05:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Greensburg kansas tornado.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:55:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Storms
Info created by Greg Henshall/FEMA, uploaded by Consequentially, nominated by Yann
Info Greensburg, Kansas, USA, May 16, 2007. The center of town twelve days after it was hit by an F5 tornado with 200 mph (approx. 321 km/h) winds.
Support -- Yann (talk) 10:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment Someone has leant on the 'clarity' slider, sadly. I am unsure whether historical value/irreplaceability outweighs the poor photo editing. Cmao20 (talk) 01:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Abstain I would even accept the clarity filtering (HDR-ization), but the whole image is somewhat greenish-yellowish tinted. After adjusting white balance, it might be good. --Tupungato (talk) 12:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Tupungato: This image can't be changed, as it is going to be featured on the English Wikipedia, but I could propose an alternative. Yann (talk) 13:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Callaeidae (New Zealand wattlebirds)
Info Translocations, which started in the 1980s, have helped secure the future of this near-threatened New Zealand endemic. No FPs of this family. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Cute Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Wow. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Expressive. – Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:27, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
--Mile (talk) 13:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Oppose Crop is strange.
Question Can you suggest an improvement please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment Yes. Its not 1st time you put almost in the middle. Negative space should be in relation with subject. --Mile (talk) 08:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Done. Thanks; I've adopted your suggestion Mile. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support I think its better than before. --Mile (talk) 09:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Elefante africano de sabana (Loxodonta africana), parque nacional de Amboseli, Kenia, 2024-05-22, DD 07.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 20:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
Info African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. It's the largest living land animal with bulls reaching an average shoulder height of 3.04–3.36 metres (10.0–11.0 ft) and a body mass of 5.2–6.9 tonnes (11,500–15,200 lb). Since 2021, it has been listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. It is threatened foremost by habitat destruction, and in parts of its range also by poaching for meat and ivory. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Abstain Isn't the image slightly tilted to the right? I'm estimating it based on the cloud bottoms. I tried to rotate it to the left by about 1.75 degrees, and I believe it looks more correct this way. I also modified the white balance to make it look somewhat colder. I know that elephants can be quite yellowish-brownish, but in this image the plants seem to have too warm hue/white balance. I don't know what the rules and etiquette are about uploading "new versions" or variants, so I haven't uploaded it.--Tupungato (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't necessarily mean uploading the version to replace your version, but to upload a reference version to better illustrate what I mean. Tupungato (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, I got you, well, you can do that if it's necessary. I'm rather interested in your feedback about the new version Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Majestic. – Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
It could be sharper, but it's a big impressive photo Cmao20 (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Weak support
- Thanks for your feedback. I can apply more sharpness but personally I feel that sharpness is good Poco a poco (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Huh, the version since the edits you've made appears way sharper to me. Strange that. Great candidate now Cmao20 (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Harsh light at 10 am but the orientation of the sun is appropriate and the view point excellent -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral The harsh sunlight spoils it for me. Otherwise nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Frank, ok, I've adjusted the curves. Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Frank. Why replaced in Wikidata that photo (better compo, almost same quality level) by this one? --A.Savin 08:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- You alreday said not same quality level, this one has better lighting and IMHO better lighting and a more encyclopedic pose. Is this really the right frame to discuss wikidata edits? --Poco a poco (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment Nice, but I think this was not fast enough to freeze all movements. There is motion blur on the ear. Yann (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, the right ear has motion blur and 1/125s is too slow for a moving subject and it is much preferable to have a frozen subject than reaching ISO 100 in a situation like this in my opinion, otherwise nice composition -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Excellent viewpoint but the lighting still kinda spoils it. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Support for the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. --Harlock81 (talk) 08:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Dominiiklaste klooster.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Estonia
Info created & uploaded by Kalev Kuljus - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Lots of wow Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Great with lights and contrast.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment I'm puzzled, on one side the lights are wow, but the details quality are unsharp (and sometimes blurry). --PierreSelim (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The light is undoubtedly great, but unfortunately the overall quality is too low. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose per PierreSelim. Clear wow factor, but low quality. I think a tripod was necessary here, in this dark room, to allow more parts in focus with a larger depth of field and also less ISO for a better quality. Incidentally the highlights could have been more carefully handled -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Per above, I am not fond of the top crop either Poco a poco (talk) 12:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Per above. -- Karelj (talk) 09:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Svirzh Castle 1 RB.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:18:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Question Would the castle and reflection be more interesting than the foreground grass? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- It looks interesting for me, otherwise I wouldn't have nomitated this photo. But I can be wrong because it's always difficult to evaluate own work. --Rbrechko (talk) 10:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support I actually really like the contrast provided by the foreground. It could be a little sharper but still very good IMO Cmao20 (talk) 01:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Pleasant light and colors. The background only would also make a beautiful picture, horizontally -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Gacela de Thomson (Eudorcas thomsonii), parque nacional de Amboseli, Kenia, 2024-05-23, DD 11.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 21:23:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
Info Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Named after British explorer Joseph Thomson, this is the most common type of gazelle in East Africa with numbers over 200,000. It's claimed to have top speeds up to 80–90 km/h (50–55 mph), making it the fourth-fastest land animal, after the cheetah (its main predator), pronghorn, and springbok. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 07:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Could be more centered for my taste but good quality.--Ermell (talk) 08:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment If this was my nomination, it would have been opposed as being undercategorized. Better add Category:Eudorcas thomsonii (male)! Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- That kind of votes are just a provocation, Charles, don't bother. There is also an oppose in my second nom and I'm not really sure why. Btw, PierreSelim took care of the cat, thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 17:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Beautiful photo of this elegant creature. – Aristeas (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Personally, I find this positioning according to the rule of thirds better than a centered solution. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The head is where it is but the body is in the center. I would call this a (successful) centered composition, with moderate lead room and margins equal to a third approximately -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the further review regarding the lead room. I'm curious, would the diagonal method work here? -- Radomianin (talk) 05:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sure Poco holds a lot of secrets :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you may be disappointed. I know the theory but I have to say that at the end of the day I played around with the crop and chose this one because it dwas the most pleasant to me. It doesn't fullfil the rule of 2/3 or the diagonal method, though. Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Excellent capture of an animal in the wild, with uniform background. Looking at viewer -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 05:24, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Stained glass with St. Andrew in Pazzi Chapel. Basilica Santa Croce in Florence, Italy.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 07:32:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info created by Ввласенко - uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Ввласенко -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but per comments on your previous stained glass nomination I think these images have the contrast and saturation pumped up too high so that the colours of the glass are exaggerated, and the details around the window are completely black. I don't like stained glass done like this. I prefer images like this and this which I feel manage the light conditions a lot better. Cmao20 (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak support On the one hand I prefer like Cmao20 more subtle photos of stained-glass windows (see Cmao20’s example links). On the other hand I think I remember that the two stained-glass windows in the Pazzi Chapel have indeed very saturated colours (cf. category), and we have many FPs of stained-glass windows in this more traditional style. There is a good reason for that: photographing stained glass is tricky because of the high contrast, it’s hard to protect both the pastel colours of the highlights and the very dark shadows. When we also consider the difficult circumstances (the window is high on the wall and the Chapel is often a crowded place), I think we can still call this a good and useful reproduction of the window. – Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- To be clear, I wouldn't vote for any of the stained glass images in the 'traditional style' either. I did vote for one a bit like this in 2019 but I was very new to Commons then and didn't know much about this type of photography. I would oppose that image now. Cmao20 (talk) 03:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- That’s clear, it’s a very reasonable point of view and in no way I wanted to criticize you. I just wanted to consider the photo from my own (a bit different) point of view, also in order to offer other voters some more aspects from which they can choose when making their own judgment. I always think that some diversity of the evaluations is helpful to ensure a well-balanced discussion and assessment. – Aristeas (talk) 11:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to Cmao20 and Aristeas for your reveiws and helpful comments.
I withdraw my nomination -- Ввласенко (talk) 12:11, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 05:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Switzerland
Info Reformed earth church in Scuol. Heritage status class A protected monument Switzerland.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Well-built church in imposing landscape, solid quality. – Aristeas (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support There is a white spot left of the tower --Llez (talk) 09:34, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 13:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support As for me it would be nice to have a little bit more space at the bottom, but anyway I like this photo. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
+1 Same feeling as yours before reading your comment -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 05:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Karpvähiline0424.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 07:01:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Class : Ostracoda (Ostracods)
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Interesting, and detailed information provided. --Yann (talk) 07:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 20:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Fascinating photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing Basking of Pareronia hippia (Fabricius, 1787) - Indian Wanderer Female (Right) & Male(Left) (2) WLB.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 05:12:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 05:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Atudu (talk) 05:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Light, focus on both, and smooth homogeneous background -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Excellent! --Harlock81 (talk) 13:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Top Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Very sharp, very elegant, congrats! – Aristeas (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 08:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Haliaeetus
Info White-tailed eagle at the Bavarian Hunting Falconry Center in Tambach Castle Wildlife Park during the birds of prey flight demonstration. All by me. -- Ermell (talk) 08:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 08:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Very good light and subject in action perfectly frozen at high speed -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:41, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support It looks worse in thumbnail, but it is really well done. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:36, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support – Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support----Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 05:31, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Jaszczurówka at Winter.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 17:46:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
Info created by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - uploaded by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Wow. Great atmosphere Cmao20 (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment Nice but too dark IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 22:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Underexposed Agree with Poco. Even an atmospheric image needs to offer a little more distinguishable content. The roof and the trees are currently too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Heavily manipulated image. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Question Frank, this is a very important hint, can you elaborate a bit on the manipulation? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- The overprocessing (in particular with regard to the colors) makes this look super artificial to me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your assessment, Frank! It seems the photographer was after a very painterly look … – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I hear you. I guess it's more a matter of taste and what the image is being used for. In my opinion, for a piece of art to be hung on the wall, it would be wonderful. But in an encyclopedic context, the heavy-handed processing is just to much. At least for me. Given the artistic merit, I'd be perfectly ok with it being promoted.--Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank Schulenburg: it has very little post-processing, I only used tonal curves to change the contrast. Everything looks just like it was when I took the picture. Jakub T. Jankiewicz (talk) 13:18, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Neutral I’m torn on this one: on the one hand I am conviced by Frank’s assessment, on the other hand I can’t deny the atmosphere and effect of the result. After looking at other photos of the church it seems not totally unrealistic to me, so I am inclined to regard the editing as within the creative freedom of the photographer. – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak support The image looks natural to me (eventhough it's a bit underexposed in my opinion, hence the weak support) and I honestly think the image was not edited much from what was captured with the camera. In night photography long exposure shots like this one (6sec exposure) often lead to such colors and such light effects -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak support per Giles –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Dark but very nice IMHO -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak support After some reflection and thought, I agree with Giles' evaluation. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Level of detail too low in the dark areas, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 19:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography
Info Two wood knots which resemble two eyes in the wooden fence at the north side of the plot Lembergerstrasse no. 13, Beilstein, Württemberg, Germany. All by – Aristeas (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support I like this simple example of pareidolia along with the rich texture of the aged wood. Two fellows have told me that they particularly like this photo, so I’m going to give it a try. What do you think? – Aristeas (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment What do I think? Mmmm. It's a knotty problem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support The eyes look so big that you can imagine the mouth open :) Great example of pareidolia, similar to this sad one from your archive. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 06:36, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support it's really cool how this resembles a pair of eyes. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Different Poco a poco (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support----Famberhorst (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 12:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Pareidolia not the most obvious at first sight (although I don't deny to guess it roughly, two eyes of course, eventually a nose, and a discreet closed mouth) but the light is pleasant, the level of detail very high, and the composition appealing. I also appreciate Radomianin's link and agree both images match very well. They are indeed "alive" in an abstract way, beyond their representation -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 17:14:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Poland
Info A courtyard and workers’ houses below high factory chimneys in Nikiszowiec, Katowice, Poland. Between 1908 and 1918 Nikiszowiec was built for the workers of a coal mine according to the plans of the architects Emil and Georg Zillmann. Today the neighbourhood is a listed architectural monument. Created and uploaded by Radomianin, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support I like very much how this photo illustrates the life in the shadow of tall factory chimneys; this effect is enforced by the contrast of the huge chimneys with the playground equipment in the middle ground, and the subdued light of the evening sun also fits in well with this impression. – Seems that during the Wikimania 2024 in Katowice two of our fellows visited this neighbourhood at the same time; Frank Schulenburg took a very similar photo and it was hard to decide between the two. In the end I have opted for Radomianin’s image because IMHO the portrait (vertical) format and the steep diagonal of the footpath ending in the bottom right corner make the composition more dynamic and emphasize the height of the chimneys better. – Aristeas (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Many thanks for the nomination, Aristeas. When we went on the photo tour, we were just in time to catch the evening light. Personally, I like the contrast between the houses, the safe haven of the people, which is in complete contrast to the monstrous industrial architecture represented by the chimneys. I also like the lines, including the contrails, which create a kind of convergence. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support I went to another of the tours to this place - I wish I had captured the atmosphere there as well as Radomianin did! --Kritzolina (talk) 06:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --EUPBR (talk) 09:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support----Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment The two chimneys don't have the same color. The one at the right has a blueish hue. It is pink and gray, while the other at the left is red and white -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Improved file uploaded Thank you for the constructive feedback, Basile. The bluish hue of the right chimney has been removed. You are right about the different shades of red, I already noticed this during the development. On site, they actually look like this, I suspect the red paint on the right chimney is either older than the left one, or was a different quality of paint that allows the azo dyes to fade faster due to ultraviolet radiation. Here are a few examples from the same month this year, where you can see that they are just as different as in my photo: 01, 02, 03, 04 and 05. If you compare these with a photo from 10 years ago, the suspected UV light bleaching seems reasonable. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:33, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment Thanks to both of you! This is a very interesting hint, Basile. I wanted to answer that the difference seems to be mostly real, as other photos show, but Radomianin has already explained this and also improved the image – great! Best, – Aristeas (talk) 10:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Radomianin, for the clarification and useful links that confirm your words. Thanks also to Aristeas for the comment. Interesting feature of the real world! Not enough wow for me, but if a majority of supporters want this image FP, I'm fine (neutral) with a promotion -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:47, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Image:The Milky Way over Germany.png, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 03:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
Info created by Zwiebackgesicht - uploaded by Zwiebackgesicht - nominated by Zwiebackgesicht -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Why PNG? I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Neutral
{{s}}--Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)- I change my position since no answer has arrived to the questions below. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment I've never seen the Milky Way look anything like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment Per Charles, the colours certainly do look very strange. I'd like to know more about how this picture was taken. Was it during an aurora, or is a special filter being used? Cmao20 (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- The image was strongly edited : the milky way was brightened a lot and everything else extremely darkened with a painting brush. Also the stars are sadly out of focus (these shots always require manual focus and usually to achieve a good focus on the stars the cursor must be set just slightly before infinity because at infinity the focus is always missed, at least on Sony cameras but I don't know what camera was used for this one since the exif data are missing). As for the colors they are either a side effect of the strong edits or were painted in the image with a brush -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Je-str (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Giles Laurent. Surprised this is still picking up support votes. Cmao20 (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose What are these red and green stripes? The picture also looks overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Finally no, per others. Yann (talk) 12:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment I agree with the reviewers that the image looks relatively colorful compared to other images of the Milky Way. So far I have no experience with this kind of photography. But as I remember from the weather reports, there were some unusual aurora observations in Germany in August this year. Maybe that influenced this photo, but I'm just guessing. @Zwiebackgesicht: I took the liberty of creating a version with less saturation, a little less noise, and more sharpening. I also applied the sRGB color profile to ensure a consistent display on most monitors. The file was saved in the slowest mode, which reduced the file size by 20 MB while maintaining the same quality. Please see the SwissTransfer link 1/2. This is just a suggestion to be helpful, if this version is an improvement for the community and for you, please feel free to use it for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment It is certainly a lot better, but I don't know how much of the colours here are trustworthy. It's hard to know how far the original manipulations went and thus how far they should be reversed. Cmao20 (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The contrast is still completely exagerated and inaccurate and the colors are still not real, you never get colors like that with a picture of the milky way -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks to Cmao20 and Giles for your evaluations. It is difficult to adjust saturation and level values based on guesswork when the original file is not available. But I didn't want to leave it untried. I created a second version in which I reduced the brightness, contrast and saturation values significantly: SwissTransfer link 2/2. There are still a few days left until the end of the nomination period and I'm still hoping that the author will respond with his personal feedback. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- The green and red colors in the sky still come out of nowhere and don't exist in reality. There's also many blue weird zones in the black zones that look like it was painted (I think they are remains of the painting brush used to darken the sky). The whites also seem a bit too illuminated. And also the black part of the sky is underexposed in my opinion (but underexposed because of the way it was edited by painting it darker and not by the way of taking the photo). I think the image has to be reworked from raw because the way it was edited to make everything else than the milky way much darker probably caused details to be lost there -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your insightful remarks, Giles. You're right, without the raw file we can't make any progress here. It's a pity that the author/nominator hasn't responded yet. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, if improvements can be made in this case, I think working from the RAW file would be better. At least to see from where we start -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Entrance lobby of Amantaka luxury Resort & Hotel at blue hour in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 22:59:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Beautiful light + composition Cmao20 (talk) 00:22, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support lovely composition. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Very pleasing composition, beautiful contrast between blue hour outside and warm lighting inside. – Aristeas (talk) 20:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:03, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 12:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas — Rhododendrites talk | 13:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:04, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support If you had moved the tripod 5 cm to the left (or maybe less) the composition would have been absolutely perfect. However, a photo to be noted and to be taken into consideration for the complementary colors that alternate to create a relaxing effect. --Terragio67 (talk) 05:44, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'll try to remember that for next time. Thank you very much for your insightful / constructive appreciation -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:55, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- 3.5cm I think... Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Terragio67. The centering is not optimal in my opinion.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing Nectering of Belenois aurota (Fabricius, 1793) - Pioneer WLB.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 12:35:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Sandipoutsider -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Question male? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose we are probably spoilt with crispy sharpness and detail of Lepidopteras here, this one is below the bar, the eye is blurry, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco, unfortunately this is not sharp, even though the composition is great Cmao20 (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, very beautiful and well-composed, but just too soft (maybe the AF missed the focus?). – Aristeas (talk) 10:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose no wow + unsharp. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Écomusée d’Alsace 87.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 09:47:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Beautiful photo of a charming timber-framed house in very authentic condition. The storks on the roof are a nice extra and so typical for the Alsace. – Aristeas (talk) 10:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --EUPBR (talk) 12:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Küchenhelfer.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 17:02:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects
Info created by Otto Domes - uploaded by Otto Domes - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Really nice. One of the few instances where black and white really works, because it focusses the eye on shapes and forms. Cmao20 (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support as per Cmao20. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support The moment when an arrangement of everyday tools resembles an artwork; black and white definitely helps here. – Aristeas (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 and Aristeas --Rbrechko (talk) 12:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Beautiful interplay of light and shadow, with good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:26, 1 December 2024 (UTC)